Speaking in the assembly

Anonymous

Q. — Is there any restrictive rule as to speaking in the assembly?

A. — Certainly. In 1 Corinthians 14:27–29 there are restrictive rules as to speaking in the assembly. The very disorder in the church at Corinth furnished the occasion for the profit of all afterwards: ‘If any one speak with a tongue, let it be two, or at the most three, and separately, and let one interpret; but if there be no interpreter, let him be silent in the assembly, and let him speak to himself and to God. And let two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge.’

The Apostle had just laid down the great principle, ‘Let all things be done to edification.’ Then he applies it to the two typical or representative cases: to a tongue on the one hand; and on the other to prophesying. He begins with what the vain Greek mind affected most, speaking with a tongue, because it was so open and surprising, a witness of divine power. It electrified people. But in an assembly, if alone, it did not edify. Therefore if he who had ‘a tongue’ could not interpret, or no interpreter was there, he must be silent and content with speaking to himself and to God — an excellent lesson, where there was the desire to display that gift. Even if there was an interpreter, edifying required only two or at the most three.

Next, he turns to prophesying, which had the highest character of direct edifying, and directs that two or three prophets speak, and let the others judge — not add their contributions, which could only distract instead of edifying and hinder the profit of what came from God. Under this regulation comes teaching of any kind ‘in assembly’ for edification, encouragement, consolation, exhortation, warning or any other spiritual aim. More than two or three, even if possessed of the most weighty of God’s gifts, is forbidden in the most distinct and absolute way.

The question is: if we believe that grace still preserves meeting ‘in assembly’, and if we in divine mercy cherish so signal a privilege, in spite of its absence in general, are we subject to the ‘Lord’s commandment’ in these things as in all else? It is to be feared that many forget it and think that prevalent ruin opens the door to laxity and self-will. Perhaps others too have heard not many years since of no less than eight speakers occupying a professedly Christian assembly and boasting of this plethora of talk, as if it were a proof of zeal, simplicity or the freedom which the Spirit of the Lord creates! It really indicated their lack of intelligence or subjection to the inspired Word which they could not but know, but failed to recognise, and love of letting their voices be heard on such a solemn occasion, which is meant to witness that God is verily in or among the saints.

In verses 34–36 is another and a prohibitory rule: ‘Let [the] women be silent in the assemblies, for it is not permitted to them to speak; but to be in subjection, as the law also says. But if they wish to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is a shame for a woman to speak in assembly. Did the word of God go out from you, or did it come to you only?’

Such is His regulation of His assembly. Would we as Christians prefer, or even tolerate for ourselves, an assembly independent of God, where man speaks as he pleases? How necessary it is to judge ourselves, especially if we exercise the title to judge other people. What is more excellent than obedience?

_________________

From: Truth & Testimony, 2020 (originally published in The Bible Treasury (1904) vol. 5 (NS) p. 112).